DSpace Repository

Financing Secondary Education in Kenya: Cost Reduction and Financing Options

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ngware, Moses W.
dc.contributor.author Onsomu, Eldah N.
dc.contributor.author Muthaka, David I.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-04-23T07:20:50Z
dc.date.available 2020-04-23T07:20:50Z
dc.date.issued 2007
dc.identifier.citation Ngware, M. W., Onsomu, E. N., & Muthaka, D. I. (2007). Financing secondary education in Kenya: Cost reduction and financing options. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 15(24). Retrieved [date] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v15n24/. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1068–2341
dc.identifier.uri https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1099666.pdf
dc.description Universal Journal of Educational Research en_US
dc.description.abstract The paper examines the financing status of secondary education in Kenya and explores possible cost reduction and financing options in the long term. Educational needs for secondary education in Kenya are on the increase since the introduction of Free Primary Education in 2003. Financing of secondary education continues to be a challenge to the government, parents and communities at large. Identifying sustainable financing options that maximize on cost-effectiveness in resource utilization is therefore critical. The study utilized secondary data obtained from education trend statistics, the 2003 Kenya school census, and the Teachers Service Commission. The education simulation and financial projection tool provided the basis for projecting both growth in secondary enrollments, resource needs, and financial implications of various policy options. Some of the insights from the study show that expenditure on secondary education as a proportion of GDP and the total education public budget averaged 1.6% and 22%, respectively. Public financing is predominantly recurrent, while non-recurrent expenditures are estimated at 6%. High-income quintiles benefit more from public provision and financing of secondary education compared to the low-income quintiles. Feasible financing options would therefore include increasing secondary education revenue and fiscal allocation on non-salary expenditures. Cost reduction measures should target the expansion of quality day schools, efficiency utilization of teachers, and streamlined procurements. The paper provides research findings and makes objective projections with a view to informing researchers, education managers and policy makers. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College en_US
dc.subject Education finance en_US
dc.subject Secondary education en_US
dc.subject Kenya en_US
dc.title Financing Secondary Education in Kenya: Cost Reduction and Financing Options en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account