DSpace Repository

The Funding of Free Primary Education and Its Prospects for Sustainability in Kakamega and Kajiado Counties, Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ogola, Martin O.
dc.contributor.author Olembo, Jotham
dc.contributor.author Mse, Godfrey
dc.date.accessioned 2020-05-11T08:34:18Z
dc.date.available 2020-05-11T08:34:18Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Education and Practice Vol.5, No.35, 2014 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2222-288X
dc.identifier.issn 2222-1735
dc.identifier.uri https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/17449/17708
dc.identifier.uri http://kerd.ku.ac.ke/123456789/427
dc.description An article published in Journal of Education and Practice en_US
dc.description.abstract The introduction of Free Primary Education in Kenya left the government with a greater role and burden in financing primary education. The new role encompassed mobilization of resources, paying tuition fees, training, recruitment and paying teachers, and the provision of infrastructure and instructional materials. Parents on the other hand were required to provide basic needs for their children such as school uniforms, food and transport to school where necessary. This paper sought to establish the funding mechanisms for FPE and examine the sustainability of the FPE initiative. The study was conducted in Kakamega and Kajiado districts (now Counties). From the 59 schools sampled, 59 headteachers and 177 teachers were included in the study. Fourteen Area Education Officers (AEOs), 118 parents, 118 School Management Committee (SMC) members, 2 District Education Officers and 7 senior officers from the Ministry of Education headquarters were also interviewed. The study used questionnaires, interview schedules and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) for data collection. Head teachers and teachers indicated that no preparation for FPE had been given to them prior to implementation and the training given after introduction of FPE was inadequate and rushed. Head teachers and teachers revealed that most parents were not actively involved in school management affairs and had misinterpreted the FPE policy. Members of SMC were seen as lacking the necessary capacity to contribute effectively in financial management, budgeting and curriculum support in schools. Still, SMCs were more supportive than PTAs. Five concerns emerged as fundamental to the sustainability of FPE in Kenya: budgetary provisions and constraints, Kenya’s economic performance, donor support, political commitment and community support. The sustainability of FPE is threatened by high cost of funding, the shortage of teachers, reliance on donor support, uncertainty over continued political goodwill, slowed growth of the Kenyan economy and the apathy from parents. There are policy gaps relating to early childhood education, admission of pupils into primary schools and allocation of FPE grants. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher International Knowledge Sharing Platform en_US
dc.subject Funding en_US
dc.subject Free Primary Education en_US
dc.subject Prospective Sustainability en_US
dc.subject Kakamega en_US
dc.subject Kajiado Districts en_US
dc.subject Kenya en_US
dc.title The Funding of Free Primary Education and Its Prospects for Sustainability in Kakamega and Kajiado Counties, Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account