DSpace Repository

Critique of Plato’s Conception of Morality With Reference to the Teachers’ Expected Examination Integrity in Kenya.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Andafu, Edward Maina
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-11T07:16:20Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-11T07:16:20Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.uri http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/109232/EDWARD%20%20ANDAFU%20FINAL.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.identifier.uri http://kerd.ku.ac.ke/123456789/957
dc.description A Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Award of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education, School of Education, University of Nairobi en_US
dc.description.abstract Teachers’ indulgence in examination malpractices is a global phenomenon that taints their integrity. In Kenya, such vices have persisted despite the teachers’ awareness of the expected examination integrity, as spelt out in the Teachers Service Commission (TSC) Code of Conduct and Ethics and the Code of Regulations. This study examines Plato’s theory of morality with reference to the teachers’ expected examination integrity. Plato’s theory of morality gives prominence to possession of knowledge as a prerequisite of informing right actions. The study seeks to establish why some professional teachers in Kenya engage in examination dishonesty despite their awareness of the expected examination conduct. It employs the philosophical methods of inquiry namely the critical, logical analysis and speculation. The study uses Immanuel Kant’s Deontological Theory of morality as the theoretical framework, which presupposes reason as a guide to moral conduct. The critical method examines Plato’s theory of morality and the Kenya National Examinations Council’s (KNEC) initiatives to combat examination malpractices. The analytic method clarifies concepts, statements and terms relating to the study; the speculative method establishes the conflict between knowledge and action. The study analyses cases of teachers’ involvement in examination malpractices in the Kenya Certificate of Primary Education (KCPE) and Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE) examinations and the effectiveness of the empirical approach in combating examination malpractices. It finds out that the strategies employed by KNEC to curb examination vices do not enhance the teachers’ internalization of moral and professional virtues regarding examination integrity. This culminates in the manifestation of akratic tendencies among teachers whereby they persistently indulge in examination vices. The study proposes the use of metaphysical approach in facilitating teachers’ adherence to examination integrity, based on the stages of the examination life cycle. Such approach activates the individual’s faculty of reason, which is key in actualizing moral judgments. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship University of Nairobi en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Nairobi en_US
dc.subject Plato’s Conception of Morality en_US
dc.subject Reference to the Teachers’ en_US
dc.subject Expected Examination Integrity en_US
dc.subject Kenya en_US
dc.title Critique of Plato’s Conception of Morality With Reference to the Teachers’ Expected Examination Integrity in Kenya. en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account