Abstract:
Secondary school students face challenges of safely wading through their adolescence in a world where
the culture of drug use and sexual immorality is fast becoming the norm other than exception. As
adolescents transit this turbulent stage they increasingly engage in risky behaviours despite the efforts
made by schools, government and the society at large to address the challenges. The role parents in
helping their children face the adolescent challenges cannot be underestimated, however, the extent to
which parenting styles determine secondary school students‟ behaviours is not well understood. This
study examined parenting styles, as predictors of selected behaviours among public secondary school
students in Embu County, Kenya. Five objectives guided the study: to investigate the extent to which
parenting styles predict secondary school students’ risky sexual behaviours, to find out the extent to
which parenting styles predict secondary school students’ drug use, to establish the extent to which
parenting styles predict secondary school students' violent behaviours, to investigate extent to which
parenting styles predict secondary school students suicidal behaviours and to establish extent to which
parenting styles predict dropping out of school by students in secondary school. The study was anchored
on Bronfernbrenners’ bioecological theory and parenting styles theory by Maccoby and Martins. Cross
sectional survey research design was adopted for the study. Data on parenting style and students’ risky
behaviours, were collected by use of questionnaires, focus group discussion guide was used to collect indepth views of students while interview guide was used to collect views of guidance and counseling
teachers on students’ behaviours. The study targeted population of 8820. Purposive sampling was used to
select a sample of 15 schools. A sample of 399 students was selected using systematic random sampling.
The study also used a sample of 15 Guidance and counseling teachers and 70 secondary school dropouts,
purposively selected. Reliability for the parenting styles questionnaires and students’ behaviour were
calculated, an average cronbach alpha (α) of α = 0.82 for parenting styles questionnaires was reported and
α = 0.78 for risky behaviour. Data was analyzed by use of descriptive statistics such as: frequency tables,
means percentages and inferential statistics. All the study hypotheses were tested by use of multiple linear
regressions. The major findings of the study based on the study objectives showed that parenting styles
significantly predict secondary school students‟ behaviours studied, specifically parenting styles
predicting students risky sexual behaviours (R 2 =0. 483, P< 0.05), parenting styles predicting drug use
(R2 = 0.644, P< 0.05), Parenting styles predicting students’ violence (R2 =0.627, P< 0.05 ), parenting
styles predicting suicidal behaviour (R2 = 0.721, P< 0.05) and parenting styles predicting students school
dropout (R2 =0.862, P< 0.05). The study also established that authoritative parenting style is the most
protective of students against behaviours of students which are undesirable. The study recommends that,
students’ behaviours be addressed through combined efforts of the government; school BOM, PTA. Each
agent should be involved in intervention measures which target educating and empowering parents on
good parenting.