DSpace Repository

Many Children Left Behind? Textbooks and Test Scores in Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Glewwe, Paul
dc.contributor.author Kremer, Michael
dc.contributor.author Moulin, Sylvie
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-08T06:45:48Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-08T06:45:48Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.citation American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2009, 1:1, 112–135 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/app.1.1.112
dc.identifier.uri http://kerd.ku.ac.ke/123456789/1656
dc.description An Article Published in American Economic Journal: Applied Economics en_US
dc.description.abstract A randomized evaluation in rural Kenya finds, contrary to the previous literature, that providing textbooks did not raise average test scores. Textbooks did increase the scores of the best students (those with high pretest scores) but had little effect on other students. Textbooks are written in English, most students’ third language, and many students could not use them effectively. More generally, the curriculum in Kenya, and in many other developing countries, tends to be oriented toward academically strong students, leaving many students behind in societies that combine a centralized educational system; the heterogeneity in student preparation associated with rapid educational expansion; and disproportionate elite power. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher American Economic Journal: Applied Economics en_US
dc.subject Children en_US
dc.subject Textbooks en_US
dc.subject Test Scores en_US
dc.subject Kenya en_US
dc.title Many Children Left Behind? Textbooks and Test Scores in Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account